What to Say to Someone Who Has Bad Anxiety
Hollywood seems determined to profit from remakes and sequels that picture show makers have no business writing, producing or releasing. Rather than working hard to generate new films — ones with novel plot devices, leads and stories from underrepresented communities and compelling cinematic visions, for example — the bigwigs of the American film industry are on a mission to quickly ruin whatsoever remnant of millennial childhood nostalgia.
So, information technology is with a heavy heart — and in recognition that January 10, 2021, marks five years since the passing of the admittedly legendary and incomparable David Bowie — that I am forced to accost the declaration of a Labyrinth sequel. Now, does the original film require, necessitate or even hint at a sequel? Is the lead thespian from the original picture prepared to make an advent? Is the original managing director still available? The answer to these questions is a single, resounding "NO." And yet, here we are. Sigh.
Permit me to take a brief moment to discuss why a Labyrinth sequel is an atrocious, terrible, no-practiced idea.
A Bowie-Less Labyrinth Sequel Volition Be a Travesty
The upcoming Labyrinth sequel faces some tough challenges. For starters, it'south going to be missing its eternal, androgynous Jareth the Goblin King — a.k.a. the incomparable David Bowie. In 2016, the iconic genre- and gender-bending rock star lost a long battle with liver cancer. His declining wellness was a well-kept secret, and fans and admirers from all over the world mourned his untimely passing.
If you believe that Bowie's absence from a Labyrinth sequel is more than a casting challenge than a reason to cancel the entire project, I'd recommend that you lot go back and watch the original 1986 movie. Bowie's presence extends beyond his insanely flustered hairdo, gigantic codpiece and absurd charismatic demeanor — the human also wrote and performed more half of the movie'southward soundtrack.
Seeing Bowie perform as Jareth is much like watching him every bit Ziggy Stardust. It can be challenging to separate the truth from the fiction of these performances, as Bowie becomes so engrossed in his characterization that he simply ceases to be himself. Even as an adult, it'south hard to watch Jareth the Goblin King prance, dance and sing without occasionally stopping to retrieve, "Wow. That really is David Bowie. And, yep, I will 'Trip the light fantastic toe the Magic Dance' down my hallway."
I'm distressing, but it'southward impossible for a casting director to find a multitalented actor/musician to make full Bowie'southward shoes in an upcoming sequel. It'due south besides a claiming to imagine whatever viable reason why the original — seemingly immortal — Goblin Rex would have suddenly changed form. This type of defoliation but deepens when considering what might become of the Labyrinth's creatures.
The Absenteeism of Jim Henson'southward Creative Genius
Jim Henson, the mastermind behind the Muppets, directed the original Labyrinth film. His masterful puppetry showed a depth of skill unmatched by rival puppeteers, and in a time without impressive CGI graphics, he was i of the go-to guys for practical special furnishings. Sadly, Henson passed abroad in 1990. Since that time, in that location have been no less than five theatrical releases with his charming Muppet characters — and they've all been atrocious.
Some might take those movies every bit a sign that Henson's absence is no big deal when attempting to make a sequel. They would exist incredibly wrong. A Labyrinth sequel without Bowie AND Jim Henson would exist like a Mrs. Doubtfire sequel without Robin Williams. (Don't yous cartel, 20th Century Play tricks!) Simply end thinking about it and appreciate this magic for what it is!
Making a sequel to the Labyrinth flick without using Henson's puppets would exist like George Lucas abandoning applied puppetry from his Star Wars franchise in favor of poorly-generated calculator graphics. Oh…that'south already happened, and the response has been less-than-stellar. Fans who have grown up watching a specific film are bound to feel slighted, misunderstood or just plain cheated when that film ends upward lost in technological translation.
Non convinced that fans don't want a CGI-heavy Labyrinth remake? Have a wait at how The Panthera leo King fanbase (and critics) reacted to the CGI "live-activeness"' Disney remake. Here'southward a spoiler: They didn't like it.
A Project Fueled by Profits, Not Passions
All of this begs the question, "Why are these executives dark-green-lighting so many '80s remakes and sequels right now?" Unfortunately, the respond lies in nostalgia-based profit. Academics take long studied consumer behavior, and it seems that recent studies accept not fallen on deafened ears.
In 2014, the Journal of Consumer Inquiry published findings on the connection between nostalgia and money-spending habits. They discovered that people are more willing to spend money when they're feeling sentimental or nostalgic. Advertizement executives and picture producers have taken this tidbit of information and run with it.
That's why our electric current film industry is flooded with remakes and unasked-for sequels, particularly to icons from the 1980s and 1990s. Children from that era are now full-fledged adults with existential dread most the hereafter every bit climate change, pandemics and political chaos leave generations clamoring for familiar, comforting nostalgia.
But rather than re-releasing original footage on updated media (think Blu-ray and 4K downloads), the motion picture manufacture would rather take existing intellectual property and rebrand it for the younger generation. In most cases, the result is an alienated original audition and a disinterested youth. This is all washed in the proper name of and for the sake of profit.
Then Delight, Leave This Jewel of a Picture Lonely
A flick shouldn't be pre-judged as good or bad, of grade, merely should instead be judged by its merit, reception and lasting bear upon. Still, even the almost advanced hologram technology could not revive Bowie's onscreen presence (NOR SHOULD It). And no amount of CGI could replace the actuality and wonder of Henson'south creations.
The simply matter that could remain consistent betwixt the original Labyrinth film and its proposed sequel is its main screenwriter, Terry Jones (of Monty Python fame and glory). Just as of this moment, in that location'south no word from the crumbling Brit as to his possible interest in writing a sequel.
Equally a result, there'south little promise that a Labyrinth 2 would be anything more a shameless, soulless cash grab aimed at adults who long for the simpler, stranger world that lay before them during the '80s. Whatever project based on profit, not passion, is doomed to fail, and that'due south why I'm not looking forward to the mess of a sequel that undoubtedly lies alee.
Source: https://www.ask.com/entertainment/labyrinth-sequel-bad-idea?utm_content=params%3Ao%3D740004%26ad%3DdirN%26qo%3DserpIndex
0 Response to "What to Say to Someone Who Has Bad Anxiety"
Post a Comment